real time electrocardiogram ecg monitoring (Wearable Sensing)
Structured Review

Real Time Electrocardiogram Ecg Monitoring, supplied by Wearable Sensing, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/real+time+electrocardiogram+ecg+monitoring/ecg+electrocardiogram+monitoring+real+time/pmc13168234-118-13-7
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT"
Article Title: Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-43578-6
Figure Legend Snippet: CLARITY-AI 2.0 overview and deployment context. (a) End-to-end hybrid architecture showing on-device ECG feature extraction, cloud inference, and the integrated explainability + security layers (SHAP-LLM explanations and intrusion detection) designed for security-aware edge cardiac monitoring. (b) Deployment scenario for continuous ECG streaming in a medical IoT setting, highlighting how predictions, explanations, and trust/security flags are delivered to enable interpretable and trustworthy decision support at the network edge.
Techniques Used: Extraction
Figure Legend Snippet: Multi-source data segmentation and input representation. Visual overview of the data preparation pipeline and beat-level segmentation. The figure illustrates how 12-lead ECG signals are segmented and aligned into a single beat representation; the example shown is a beat from the PTB-XL dataset rendered consistently across all 12 leads for downstream feature extraction and modeling.
Techniques Used: Extraction
Figure Legend Snippet: Local explanation case study (ANOMALY/PVC): SHAP + LLM report. Example of a model-specific explanation for an anomalous beat. (a) The ECG segment used for inference. (b) SHAP waterfall plot showing the dominant positive/negative feature contributions driving the anomaly decision. (c) The corresponding LLM-generated clinician-readable explanation produced from the SHAP evidence.
Techniques Used: Generated, Produced
Figure Legend Snippet: Local explanation case study (NORMAL): SHAP + LLM report. Example explanation for a normal beat. (a) The ECG segment used for inference. (b) SHAP waterfall plot showing which features support the normal classification versus counter-evidence. (c) The final clinician-oriented LLM explanation grounded in the SHAP attribution list.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: On-device efficiency on ESP32 (latency + footprint). On-device benchmark comparing CLARITY-AI 2.0 to a 1D-CNN baseline deployed on the same ESP32. The figure summarizes runtime feasibility and resource usage, showing that CLARITY-AI 2.0 is 11.7× faster and remains well below a 100 ms real-time constraint for beat-level inference, while also substantially reducing model/storage demands (energy results are detailed in Fig. ).
Techniques Used:
Related Articles
Extraction:Article Title: Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT Article Snippet: In contrast, recent advances in Generated:Article Title: Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT Article Snippet: In contrast, recent advances in Produced:Article Title: Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT Article Snippet: In contrast, recent advances in |